Criteria Cognitive Aptitude (CCAT) Practice Test 2025 – All-in-One Resource to Master Your Exam Success!

To analyze the statements, let's break them down step by step.

1. The first statement tells us that Tom is fatter than Jack, which means Tom's weight is greater than Jack's.

2. The second statement indicates that Tom is thinner than Joe, implying that Joe's weight is greater than Tom's.

3. The last statement says Jack is fatter than Joe, meaning that Jack's weight is greater than Joe's.

Now, combining these insights, we can establish the relationships:

- From the first statement, we know Tom > Jack.

- From the second statement, we can infer Joe > Tom.

- The third statement suggests Jack > Joe.

When combined, we have a situation where Jack is greater than Joe, but if we place Tom in context, we see a contradiction. If Jack is greater than Joe and Tom is greater than Jack, then it implies that Tom is also fatter than Joe. This contradicts the second statement where Tom is supposed to be thinner than Joe.

Thus, with the information provided, the relationships create inconsistencies, leading us to conclude that the statements cannot logically coexist. Therefore, the answer is that it is false to conclude a definite relationship among the three, as it presents contradictory